GSK plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK) welcomes the plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of the next Zantac case (Kasza), which was scheduled to start trial in Illinois state court on 10 June 2024. GSK did not settle Ms. Kasza’s claim and has not paid anything in exchange for the voluntary dismissal.

Following the 16 epidemiological studies looking at human data regarding the use of ranitidine, the scientific consensus is that there is no consistent or reliable evidence that ranitidine increases the risk of any cancer.

GSK will continue to vigorously defend itself and manage this litigation in the best interests of the company and shareholders.

About GSK
GSK is a global biopharma company with a purpose to unite science, technology, and talent to get ahead of disease together. Find out more at gsk.com

see about the case

Statement: Zantac (ranitidine) litigation – GSK starts process for appeal of recent Delaware Daubert decision
Download (PDF, 132.5KB)
Delaware Superior Court’s ruling inconsistent with how Daubert standard* has previously been applied in Delaware and federal courts
Application has been filed seeking right of appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court
GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim are all parties to the application
Scientific consensus remains that there is no consistent or reliable evidence that ranitidine increases the risk of any cancer
GSK plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK) today confirms that the Company has taken the first step to seek appeal of the recent Daubert ruling, made by the Delaware Superior Court, which permits plaintiff expert testimony as part of the Zantac (ranitidine) litigation in Delaware. GSK strongly disagrees with the Delaware Superior Court’s ruling and has filed an application with the court to appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court for interlocutory review of the decision. Pfizer, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim are all parties to the application.

While interlocutory reviews are granted in exceptional circumstances, GSK believes such circumstances are present here and that it is important to raise these matters now to the Delaware Supreme Court.

The Superior Court’s ruling is inconsistent with how the Daubert standard has been applied previously in Delaware and federal courts. As such, differing rulings interpreting how the Daubert standard is to be applied to litigation before Delaware Courts, now exist. The Superior Court’s ruling would therefore have profound implications for all companies and businesses incorporated in Delaware.

If the Delaware Superior Court grants the application for appeal, the case for interlocutory review of the decision will proceed to the Delaware Supreme Court for consideration.

If the Delaware Superior Court rejects the application, GSK and the other defendants will seek leave to appeal directly to the Delaware Supreme Court.

A decision, on whether to grant interlocutory review and hear the appeal, would be expected from the Delaware Supreme Court sometime later this year.

The scientific consensus remains that there is no consistent or reliable evidence that ranitidine increases the risk of any cancer. There are 16 epidemiological studies looking at human data regarding the use of ranitidine, including outcomes for more than 1 million patients using ranitidine, supporting this consensus.

GSK remains committed to vigorously defending itself and managing this litigation in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.